The hon. Gentleman will correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that Professor Hix also went on to say:"““I think there should have been a referendum on Maastricht, on Amsterdam, on Nice…on the Lisbon treaty””."
That is surely significant. The Bill is all about ensuring that, having been cheated of referendums on those treaties in the past, we can now have referendums on other matters, enabling the House to give greater consideration to them before passing away powers to Europe. The committee proposed in the hon. Gentleman's new clause 9 would not achieve that.
European Union Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Charlie Elphicke
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 24 January 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
522 c42 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 14:09:17 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_704408
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_704408
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_704408