UK Parliament / Open data

Localism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Andy Slaughter (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Localism Bill.
I am grateful for that intervention, because it has given me a little more time to amplify the point that I was making. In view of what has been said today about provision for Gypsy and Traveller sites, I think that Members should sometimes examine their rhetoric. The single most important issue is that the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs wishes to cut all provision for Gypsies and Travellers: both the capital funding and the requirement for local authorities to provide sites for them. If there were enough sites, there would not be unlawful encampments. It is shocking that the Government should wilfully close their eyes to that fact and simply introduce civil and criminal penalties for Gypsies and Travellers, and they should examine their conscience. Finally, let me echo the words of Sir Christopher Kelly, who said that the end of the standards regime allowed councils, such as Hammersmith and Fulham, to get away with what they were doing. That provision should also be rejected.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

521 c600 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Legislation

Localism Bill 2010-12
Back to top