It will be a question of it coming not to court but to the NAO, which is dealt with in the second part of the Bill. It seems to me that the office would have been on much stronger ground if it was simply told that it must carry out these functions than if it merely said, ““Oh well, if it’s all right, I was aiming to but I’ve failed””. None the less, to a degree I take the point made by my noble friend and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 37 withdrawn.
Clause 7 agreed.
Clause 8 : Reports
Clause 8 : Reports
Amendments 38 and 39 not moved.
Clause 8 agreed.
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Higgins
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 December 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c36GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:15:24 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689477
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689477
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689477