My Lords, the amendment, which has a whole clause to itself, is not difficult to understand. The Bill as drafted states: "““The Office must aim to carry out its functions efficiently and cost-effectively””."
The amendment seeks to delete the words ““aim to”” so that it reads, ““The Office must carry out its functions efficiently and cost-effectively””. There would be a loophole if the office could simply say that it was aiming to do this when it may not achieve that objective. More sensibly it should be mandated to operate efficiently and cost-effectively, otherwise it may overspend its budget by an enormous amount and say, ““Do not worry, these are unforeseen circumstances. We aim to do it””. I beg to move.
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Higgins
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 December 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c34GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:15:22 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689473
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689473
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689473