My Lords, the whole purpose of a Committee stage is to get to the bottom of certain difficult aspects of a Bill. I am sure that it is right that the Minister should look at the matter very carefully between now and Report, in particular with the parliamentary draftsmen. I have no doubt that the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, and others can look at it as well. It might be helpful to keep in touch on whether we all agree on the amendment to table or whether we should put down alternatives. At all events, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 30 withdrawn.
Amendments 31 to 35 not moved.
Clause 5 agreed.
Clause 6 : Guidance as to how main duty is to be performed
Amendment 36
Clause 6 : Guidance as to how main duty is to be performed
Amendment 36
Moved by
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Higgins
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 December 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c30-1GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:19:13 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689464
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689464
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689464