I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Burns. I think that he gets it right. I am sympathetic to the underlying concern of the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, to try to solve a problem. The analysis of sustainability—the main duty of the office—has to have regard to, and be in the light of, the Government’s economic policy, so I do not think that there is any other way of doing it. Of course we must get the technical drafting right on this. In so far as there is any potential problem, we need to get it right.
I sometimes find the drafting of these things a bit obtuse, but I am advised by the experts on how these things are drafted that Clause 5(3) deals with the issue that the amendment is intended to remedy. That subsection states: "““Where any Government policies are relevant to the performance of that duty, the Office may not consider what the effect of any alternative policies would be””."
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sassoon
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 December 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c220-1GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:10:18 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_688244
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_688244
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_688244