UK Parliament / Open data

Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]

Before the Minister rises, I shall raise a point of order. I was under the impression that, when we meet in Grand Committee, we do not divide the Committee at all, so withdrawing amendments is totally irrelevant. I have no intention of withdrawing my amendments, but I am not going to divide on them. Rather like the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, I want to hear the Minister give some reasoned answers including that he would like to think about it a bit more. He does not have to agree with us, but I thought that the whole point of meeting in Grand Committee was to behave non-politically, if I may say so, and co-operatively to clarify the Bill in order to make progress when we go back into the Chamber, when, no doubt, we will divide the House. I am beginning to get very irritated with the repetition of ““withdraw the amendment”” because I do not think that we are here for that purpose. We may withdraw it formally, but that is not the point.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

722 c92-3GC 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top