UK Parliament / Open data

Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]

I am glad that we are starting to get the matter addressed, but this is Committee stage and it is no good, if I may say so, taking a Civil Service attitude of, ““We’ll think about anything that comes in””. This is Committee stage. I have made a proposal and suggested the document should be shorter, not longer. I know that it is a draft. I have said that, if the Minister cannot explain why intergenerational is the one bit of fairness that is picked out, why not leave out ““intergenerational”” and just say ““fairness””? Could we actually engage here, please? What is the answer?

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

722 c90GC 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top