I can never give an absolute guarantee; it would have to be a guarantee given by me at this stage. All that I am saying is that I believe that it would be possible if necessary. I might be wrong, but my noble friend will have to rest on that assurance. The important thing is that we think that it is right and proper to get these things sorted out, as we are doing now, for 2011-12, then publish our waste review and then take things forward and make further decisions thereafter. I know that my noble friend says that the price of glass has collapsed. We have seen that in the past and it has gone back up again. We have seen that with other recyclables. I think we can cope with that. These are not the only drivers in this field; as I mentioned, there is also the landfill tax. I do not believe that we face the problems that my noble friend suggests.
I hope, therefore, that the Committee will accept that at this stage it is right and proper that the regulations go through, and that we will consider them again in the light of the review, which will be published in the spring of next year.
Motion agreed.
Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) (Amendment) Regulations 2010
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 November 2010.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) (Amendment) Regulations 2010.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c80-2GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:11:44 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682754
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682754
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682754