UK Parliament / Open data

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

If the Minister is so confident in his arguments, why does he not allow the public to make objections and to have a local public inquiry, rather than a bureaucrat in a quango taking only written submissions before reaching a view? The Minister has to answer that question. Another possible outcome of the proposed consultation is legal challenge by political parties, or local cross-party or apolitical campaign groups, such as Keep Cornwall Whole. Boundary commission decisions could be subject to judicial review. It is worth noting that only one judicial review resulted from the previous boundary review, but in evidence the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, Professor Ron Johnston, who is an expert on such matters, said:"““I can well see people using [judicial review] as a [means to] address the issues that they think they are not able to address because they are not having public inquiries.””" Excluding those cases when the only change was the name of the constituency, in the fifth periodic review of boundaries 27% of English constituencies were altered by one degree or another following a public inquiry into commission recommendations. In many cases, those inquiries looked at the local ties of a particular village or town. Most of the participants were concerned about the integrity of their local constituency.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

517 c710 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top