I am grateful to my hon. Friend for that point. She and I have not colluded on this, but I took the precaution of looking up the definition of ““alternative”” and its usage in the ““Shorter Oxford English Dictionary””, which says:"““Some traditionalists maintain””—"
I think that she and I are both in that category—"““from an etymological standpoint, that you can only have a maximum of two alternatives (from the Latin alter 'other (of two)') and that uses where there are more than two alternatives are erroneous.””"
However, the dictionary then says:"““Such uses are, however, normal in modern standard English.””"
More is the pity, but that is the factual situation as described in the dictionary. However, the sense that I have described is how those of us who are traditionalists, as well as a lot of other people, understand the word ““alternative””. Indeed, although I am reluctant ever to criticise a word that he says, earlier on we heard the Prime Minister use the word ““less”” when he meant ““fewer””.
Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Christopher Chope
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 October 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
516 c839 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 13:16:26 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670248
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670248
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670248