Academies Bill [HL]

My Lords, I hope that I am not going to spoil the party by referring to the first two or three amendments in this odd group. The debate seems to have become about the composition of school governing bodies which, as far as I can see, is the subject of a later group of amendments. Never mind; we soldier on. The first two amendments in the group seek to amend the words at the start of the Bill: "““The Secretary of State may enter into Academy arrangements with any person””." ““Any person”” seems an unambitious expression and one wonders why it should not, for example, say, ““Any charity””. I understood the Minister to say earlier without equivocation—this is how I read the Bill—that only a charity can be ““the other party”” for the purposes of academy arrangements. If we were to get technical—which is what we are supposed to do in this House—we would consider the Interpretation Act, which states, I think I am right in saying, that ““any person”” is any corporate entity or any individual person. It does not, for example, cover unincorporated trusts—and a great many charities are just that. If I had been kinder I would have raised these issues with the Minister before the debate, so I do not expect him to answer directly. However, I strongly recommend that the phrase ““any charity”” should be substituted for ““any person””. That would be happier, clearer and avoid the technical argument I have touched on.