Indeed, I should be very happy for that information to go to the noble Baroness.
The noble Baroness asked, too, about proposals around employers’ liability insurance bureaus and the employers’ liability tracing office. We fully appreciate the difficult situation facing individuals who struggle to trace a relevant insurance policy. While the vast majority of individuals are able to find an employer or insurer to claim against, that does not in any way reduce the distress and difficulty faced by those who cannot. I also accept that those individuals are disproportionately likely to suffer from long-tail diseases such as mesothelioma and that on top of the terrible disease they face a lack of compensation. That is why we have the 1979 Act and the 2008 scheme.
In addition to providing government support to individuals, we want to ensure that people can access civil compensation. We have therefore been working to improve people’s ability to trace employers’ liability insurance policies. In 1999, in conjunction with the insurance industry, we launched a voluntary code of practice to help to trace these policies where other routes have failed. The code has led to some improvement, but there are still too many people who are left without help. The Government do not think that is acceptable and therefore believe that more must be done.
Therefore, on 10 February, we launched a consultation on two proposals to improve the situation. We agree that an essential first step is the creation of the employers’ liability tracing office to manage an electronic database of employers’ liability insurance policies and to operate a tracing service for insurers and individuals. We envisage that the database will initially be voluntary but will in time become mandatory to provide a complete record of all employers’ liability policies issued. A tracing office along these lines will be a significant benefit to many thousands of people who need to trace policies. The ABI is already driving forward work on this proposal, which will take into account consultation responses.
While a tracing office will ensure that in future more people can obtain civil damages for industrial disease, we know from experience that it will still be difficult to trace historic policies, especially for individuals suffering from long-tail diseases. We therefore also propose to establish an employers’ liability insurance bureau, as suggested by a number of stakeholders and parliamentarians. It will provide a fund of last resort in cases where all other efforts to trace an employer or insurer have failed. This will give peace of mind to many workers who know that they were exposed to asbestos but who do not now have symptoms. They will have confidence that if they later develop an asbestos-related disease, they will be able to claim the civil compensation to which they are entitled.
The consultation is examining issues such as what the bureau should cover, the impact on insurers and employers, how much should be paid by way of compensation and the limitations on claiming from the bureau. The Government will consider fully the responses to the consultation before determining the next steps towards the bureau’s introduction. We believe that the changes we are proposing will make a real difference to the lives of people who suffer from these terrible work-related diseases and to their families.
The noble Baroness asked about contributing to the consultation. The consultation document and guidance on how to respond were sent to key stakeholders and are published on our website. We are also holding a series of consultation roadshows in Leeds, London, Bristol, Manchester and Glasgow. We have invited stakeholders to give face-to-face feedback.
With the exception of one point, I think I have covered each of the points that have been raised. The noble Baroness is quite right about the 1.5 per cent increase. As we discussed on another occasion, we believe that it is important to give some people extra support now, but the 1.5 per cent will be deducted from the full uprating a year from now.
I am grateful to noble Lords for their support for these regulations.
Motion agreed.
Mesothelioma Lump Sum Payments (Conditions and Amounts) (Amendment) Regulations 2010
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 March 2010.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Mesothelioma Lump Sum Payments (Conditions and Amounts) (Amendment) Regulations 2010.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c358-60GC Session
2009-10Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:21:41 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633379
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633379
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633379