Mr. Winterton—[Hon. Members: "Sir Nicholas."] I am sorry; Sir Nicholas. I should have thought that the ONS would be quite insulted—as I hope you are not by my mistake—by the word "randomly", and by being dismissed in such a way. I can think of no more authoritative body to provide statistics for the Government, the House and the wider public.
The civil service commissioners publish an annual report on their activities, which could include comments on the state of the civil service. I would argue that comprehensive information is already available. If new clause 33 were accepted, it would duplicate current practice. It would impose additional burdens and costs that would be disproportionate to any perceived benefit—which I cannot identify—and it is really not necessary.
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Smith of Basildon
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 November 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
498 c791 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:45:34 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_595160
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_595160
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_595160