I think that I have explained fully the way in which we have changed what was a rigid system so that, last year, we were able to give Surrey a notional budget, meaning that it would not have to rebill. However, it has always been made clear that the changes that were made last year would be taken into account this year. The authority ignored the warnings that it was given. As I have said, Surrey is the only authority that, having been notified of a notional budget requirement, set an excessive increase in the subsequent year. I have to say to all the hon. Members who have spoken that, having considered the case, the Government have no doubt that firm action needs to be taken.
I think that the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) raised the issue of judicial review—
Council Tax
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Winterton of Doncaster
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 July 2009.
It occurred during Legislative debate on Council Tax.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
495 c1194 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:45:33 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576491
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576491
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576491