I also welcome these orders. The only point that I would make is more for the publishers of legal textbooks than for the Government. I appreciate that this is an attempt to have a user-friendly document, but one of the problems of not consolidating legislation is that practitioners have to trail through the books to trace how the regulation fits in. As the Minister will be aware—certainly, his department will be—I argued strongly when the original legislation came in that it should be consolidated, and eventually the Government agreed.
It is quite difficult to see how this could have been done in a consolidated way because we are talking about other pieces of legislation that are not necessarily only about company law. However, as legislation and regulations become more and more complicated for the practitioner to follow, I often say that it is really only for the benefit of Butterworths.
Companies Act 2006 (Consequential Amendments) (Uncertificated Securities) Order 2009
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Razzall
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 July 2009.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Companies Act 2006 (Consequential Amendments) (Uncertificated Securities) Order 2009.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c177GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:23:43 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_574429
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_574429
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_574429