If the noble Lord seriously thinks that what I said was sexist, frankly that is just political correctness gone mad. It was a positive encouragement. I am bound to say, since he takes that ridiculous attitude, that the flow of paper coming from his officials showed quite clearly that they knew far more about what was going on than he did. Perhaps I am being unfair, but that is a ridiculous reaction and I hope that, on reflection, he withdraws it.
I do not expect the noble Lord necessarily to know now, but I ask him to undertake to write to me about what the employer—that is, the Scottish taxpayer—contribution is expected to be when the new scheme comes in. The cost of public sector pensions is a matter of great public interest and I hope that he will take his responses a bit more seriously and undertake to write to me with that information.
Scottish Parliamentary Pensions Act 2009 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2009
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 24 June 2009.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Scottish Parliamentary Pensions Act 2009 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2009.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c457GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:21:01 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_570065
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_570065
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_570065