I think that it would generally be the case that the Minister is responsible for the activities of the department and would have to account for Parliament for its activities, including those of the contractor. That would run naturally.
To accept the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, would raise unnecessary ambiguity about how customers will be treated and the safeguards by which they will be protected. I am conscious that this has been a somewhat lengthy response but it was to a fairly large group of amendments, with some technicalities embedded within them. I hope that it satisfies the noble Lord and other noble Lords who have spoken.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 June 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c335GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:42:36 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568490
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568490
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568490