I support the amendment to the extent that I, too, am bewildered about conflating these two completely different statuses because of the fear that that might engender. I would be grateful if the Minister could clarify whether the level of sanction might be different. I can understand that it might be appropriate to have similar options that might be applied to people in different circumstances, but if I were a social worker working with these people I would want to know clearly what the difference is for my client between being on a progression-to-work route and being on the work-ready group. There is a need for clarity. I am grateful to the noble Baroness for moving the amendment and look forward to the Minister’s response.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Meacher
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 June 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c322GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:07:08 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568452
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568452
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568452