The amendment would put in the Bill a requirement that is already contained in the draft regulations for statements to be issued on a six-monthly basis and at the point of account closure or transfer. We believe that this level of detailed requirement is more appropriate for secondary legislation. It is an area where we believe there should be some flexibility to enable us to respond to any lessons learnt from operating the scheme, as well as to keep pace with any future changes in banking practice. The noble Baroness does, however, make a good case. I recognise that the success of the saving gateway is importantly dependent on the availability of a significant number of account providers. While I urge the noble Baroness to withdraw the amendment, I will go away and take account of her comments.
Saving Gateway Accounts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Myners
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Saving Gateway Accounts Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c360GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:00:36 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_548064
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_548064
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_548064