The amendment seeks to limit the flexibility of regulations to set the maturity period, or account duration. Specifically, regulations would not be able to specify an account duration of less than 12 months. Members of the Committee will know that the Government propose that these accounts should last for two years. Leaving this detail to secondary legislation provides the flexibility to make alterations in the future. That might be necessary if experience of the national scheme suggests that a different account length would better achieve the aims of the saving gateway.
Based on evidence from the pilots, we believe that an account duration of 24 months will best help to initiate a savings habit. I agree that too short a period is unlikely to be effective in achieving the goal of this policy initiative. However, it is important that we are able to respond to any lessons and information that we secure from operating the national saving gateway, and that we do not place restrictions on the account duration that regulations can prescribe. I therefore hope that the noble Baroness will withdraw her amendment.
Saving Gateway Accounts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Myners
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Saving Gateway Accounts Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c334GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:22:01 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546321
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546321
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546321