I think I would like to thank everyone who took part in the debate. I thank the Minister for her answer, but she was wrong. I was not concerned about the burden of regulation on shopkeepers; people will know from Second Reading that I have not found those arguments particularly compelling. My concern was about something different altogether: smuggling. It is entirely possible to go into shops in this country and buy cigarettes that are not on display and are not on any price lists. They come from abroad and there is a good reason why they are not on display: they are part of an illegal activity. My colleagues and I remain concerned that the more you move towards prohibition, the more you can open up opportunities for markets that are illegal.
It was helpful that the Minister explained that the intention is that prices will be visible but will not be able to be used as an advertising and promotional tool. That clarity is very welcome, and on that basis I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment withdrawn.
Debate on whether Clause 19 should stand part of the Bill.
Health Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Barker
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 March 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c363GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:08:59 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535085
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535085
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535085