Further to that point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. On the matter of the new clause that was moved earlier—[Interruption] It was voted on without being moved, but we had only one vote. Would you be kind enough to look at page 623 of "Erskine May"? It says very clearly:""The last question proposed by the Speaker is, 'That the clause (or the clause as amended) be added to the bill'"."
May I also draw your attention to the fact that there have been two programme motions—on 20 October last year and 9 February this year—neither of which changed that ruling in "Erskine May" or the Standing Orders? May I ask you for your considered ruling, or that of Mr. Speaker tomorrow, that might determine that we have voted on the first part of a procedure that could have added a new clause to the Bill but not on the second part and therefore that that new clause has not been added to the Bill?
Political Parties and Elections Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Simon Hughes
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 2 March 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
488 c692 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberRelated items
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 23:44:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533439
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533439
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533439