Will my noble friend clarify the position of trade unions and their representatives and their ability to have input and make representations using these provisions? In general, my friends in the trade union movement are concerned—although that may not be the right word. Trade union members are members of the general public; they have a point of view and a vested interest in ensuring that local democracy participation works well and they think that they can make a good contribution. For instance, Unison, which represents hundreds of thousands of workers in the local government sphere, would be interested to know whether my noble friend and the department envisage a proper, secure place for trade unions, recognising that they are mature, responsible and have a part to play. It may not be a big deal. My noble friend may be able to say that that is possible under the normal procedures, but it would be helpful if she could assure the Committee that it is in the Government’s mind that the trade unions affected have a part to play and will be consulted.
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Graham of Edmonton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 January 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c24GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:38:14 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522399
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522399
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522399