I thank both noble Lords for their questions, some of which I had anticipated. We spent a considerable amount of the early part of this year discussing the work of Monitor and the CQC. We commended Monitor for the admirable way in which it goes about its business and the way in which it ensures that foundation trusts carry out the job that they are supposed to do. That is what it and the CQC would do for ambulance foundation trusts. They would be under the same regulatory regime as other foundation trusts.
The noble Earl asked about payment for results. Payment for results in the sector is not a pre-requisite for the introduction of foundation trust status. On civil contingencies, that will be part of their terms and conditions of authorisation. It will be monitored and will be part of the granting of foundation trust status. They all intend to apply. Only one or two are on the stocks for early application.
On Question, Motion agreed to.
Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (Amendment of List of Responders) Order 2008
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Thornton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 November 2008.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (Amendment of List of Responders) Order 2008.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c47GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:29:59 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508579
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508579
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508579