My Lords, as explained, the purpose of the amendment is to provide that somebody other than the person raising the defence might be the one to mitigate the detriment. However, this is unnecessary. The legislation does not require the person raising the defence to mitigate the detriment; rather, it requires the defendant to ensure that he or she takes reasonable steps to ensure that there is an appropriate mitigation in place. Therefore, if the mitigation is to be undertaken by someone other than the defendant, then the reasonable step the defendant can take is to ensure that there is an appropriate mitigation and that it is in place. I do not think that the amendment adds anything to the Government’s proposals. I hope that that has produced some clarification for the noble Baroness.
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 October 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1464-5 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:46:20 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503530
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503530
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503530