That was exactly what I suspected: that far more than 20-odd per cent of aluminium is being recycled but is not being recorded because it is not worth the hassle of having these chains of movement certified all the way along the line. In addition, I notice in the Explanatory Memorandum that there is sometimes a break in knowledge because an agency is involved that does not want to reveal where it is moving the stuff on to because it is making a profit out of it; it is then commercially confidential information.
In many ways, I am reassured that the Minister has been able to place on the record the background against which this regime operates. Opening the thing up is possibly quite wise because otherwise we would probably never achieve the targets as the exporting would go on but would never be recorded as UK recycling activity. However, I hope the Minister will agree that a careful eye needs to be kept on this in case it opens the door to illegal activity and to the pirates just as much as to the legitimate operator.
Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 2008
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Taylor of Holbeach
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 July 2008.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 2008.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c97GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:55 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490975
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490975
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490975