I thank the noble Lord for that answer. We will consider before Report whether there is enough scrutiny to see whether the money that will be spent will be publicly scrutinised and transparent. I am still somewhat concerned. I think that the legislation on the business rate probably will get through, but the Queen’s Speech is fairly late—in December—and there is an enormous so-called legislative programme planned for next year. Because the financing of Crossrail was based on the deal that was announced by the previous mayor, which a lot of people supported, there is a bit of putting the cart before the horse. We support Crossrail and want to see it happen, but the money has to be available to do it. I have been surprised the whole time that this was going forward before legislation was in place to fund it.
I note what the Minister said and will see how the legislation progresses in the next year. It puts a little doubt in mind about Crossrail’s funding. Perhaps we shall come back to it, but for today I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 66 agreed to.
Clause 67 agreed to.
Bill reported with amendments.
Crossrail Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hanningfield
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 June 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Crossrail Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c715-6GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-19 11:26:54 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487466
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487466
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487466