I support what the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, has said. Clause 41(3) is actually quite objectionable. It says: "““The Secretary of State may, on request or otherwise, direct the arbitrator as to results that are to be achieved by the agreement for which terms are to be determined by the arbitration””."
It sounds very much as if you appoint an arbitrator and then the Secretary of State tells him what result he must come to. It certainly reads like that—and it is not the sort of thing that should appear in a Bill before your Lordships' House.
Crossrail Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bradshaw
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 June 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Crossrail Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c703GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-19 11:26:54 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487444
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487444
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487444