moved Amendments Nos. 10 to 12:
10: Clause 35, page 25, line 23, at end insert—
““( ) The following may in particular be taken into account in determining whether, for the purposes of subsection (1)(b), services are likely to be subject to substantial disruption—
(a) the frequency with which the services are likely to be disrupted;
(b) the duration of the period in which the services are likely to be disrupted (and, in particular, its duration relative to the length of the franchise term);
(c) the severity of any likely disruption.””
11: Clause 35, page 25, line 25, leave out ““23(9)”” and insert ““(Duty of ORR to publish reports)(4)””
12: Clause 35, page 25, line 26, leave out ““and ““franchise agreement”””” and insert ““, ““franchise agreement”” and ““franchise term””””
On Question, amendments agreed to.
Clause 35, as amended, agreed to.
[Amendment No. 13 not moved.]
Clause 36 [Disapplication of franchising and access exemptions]:
Crossrail Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bassam of Brighton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 June 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Crossrail Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c695GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-19 11:26:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487434
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487434
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487434