Both parts of the hon. Gentleman's question are legitimate. That would be desirable, and I hope that my hon. Friend the Minister is listening to that plea, which he will hear from all sides of the debate. The most sensible way forward is to have a national framework. It is better in any case, because—let me be honest—I would not recommend the private Bill process to anybody. It is arcane and difficult and it gives disproportionate influence to those who oppose the Bill. They are right to exercise that opposition—I am not complaining—but it would be better to have the debate in the context of a national framework, which could allow local variation. Not all local authorities would need to buy into it if they did not want to—it would not be mandatory. A national framework would be better.
Manchester City Council Bill [Lords](By Order)
Proceeding contribution from
Tony Lloyd
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 June 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Manchester City Council Bill [Lords](By Order).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
477 c524-5 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:16:53 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_481399
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_481399
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_481399