I recognise that there is a distinction to be made between commercial success and financial sustainability. We want science centres to be financially sustainable. We do not expect them to make a profit and return dividends to shareholders, but we want them to be viable. Science centres that received Millennium Commission funding or the £2 million in funding provided by the Government between 2004 and 2006 did so on the basis that they would be financially sustainable or, at the very least, work towards financial viability.
The hon. Gentleman also said that he would be happy to see winners and losers when it comes to the DCMS funding applied to museums. He needs to think carefully about that. Opening up the DCMS budget, which goes to some of the UK's national treasures, to science centres and perhaps other museums, would be opening up a can of worms. I am convinced that that would not be in the UK's best interests. He might want to think about that.
Science and Discovery Centres (Funding)
Proceeding contribution from
Ian Pearson
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 May 2008.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Science and Discovery Centres (Funding).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
475 c514WH Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
Westminster HallSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 03:02:53 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473342
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473342
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473342