I hope that the Minister will not be uncharacteristically disingenuous again. He is not responding to what our report said, nor to what my hon. Friend the Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon (Dr. Harris) said. The report did not say that we expected every science centre to be funded by the Government. We said that those that were MLA accredited in the same way as the museums would be eligible for that funding. However, it would be entirely up to the sponsoring organisations to decide whether they could be grant-aided. That is what happens now.
As for whether science centres should be regarded in the same way as schools and hospitals, that was not my hon. Friend's point. He was commenting on commercial viability being the criteria by which the Government will decide whether the centres will be allowed to continue. Both in the report and in response to the Minister's predecessor, Lord Sainsbury, we commented strongly on the fact that that was not the criteria that the Government had set for the STEM agenda—an objective that science centres were trying to fulfil.
Science and Discovery Centres (Funding)
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Willis of Knaresborough
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 May 2008.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Science and Discovery Centres (Funding).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
475 c509WH Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
Westminster HallSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 03:02:53 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473330
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473330
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473330