The noble Baroness is right: I failed to answer that question. The definition of ““third parties”” is the same as that used in the context of realistic imitation firearms. We are therefore following the precedent of what is a working defence. I do not know whether that answer is enough or the noble Baroness feels that we need to get in touch with the people to whom she referred.
Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Amendment) Order 2008
Proceeding contribution from
Lord West of Spithead
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 March 2008.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Amendment) Order 2008.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c21GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:33:35 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_456025
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_456025
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_456025