My Lords, I rise simply to express my full support for Amendment No. 1. The arguments put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Wade of Chorlton, in support of his amendment are compelling and I do not think it is either necessary or helpful for me to repeat them. Whether in the end the decision is adhered to and the Government’s proposal is accepted, the arguments in favour of a fuller and further inquiry, as proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Wade, seem to be incontrovertible. If they are not incontrovertible, at least there is a strongly arguable case for what the noble Lord has proposed. I strongly support him. If his amendment is accepted, it would follow that the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Harrison, also has great strength and merit. I would support it as well.
I hope that occasionally in this House brevity can be forgiven, but I do not think it would help to repeat anything said by the noble Lord, Lord Wade.
Cheshire (Structural Changes) Order 2008
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Slynn of Hadley
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 4 March 2008.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Cheshire (Structural Changes) Order 2008.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c1051 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:36:54 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_451622
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_451622
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_451622