Will the Minister clarify the situation? I think I am right in saying that, as a result of the Further Education and Training Act, the only difference is that the boards do not have to come to Parliament every year to ask it to renew the order, as we have been doing today. This is therefore the last occasion that we shall be doing this. Equally, the concept of the industrial training board remains. I take it that the statutory framework, which stems from 1981-82, remains the same—that is, where an industry voluntarily requires a training board, it may have one, as has happened with the film industry. In the background, with Leitch, there is also a slight indication that post-2010, if companies do not come up with the training pledge, there may be some other form of statutory encouragement to training.
Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2008
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Sharp of Guildford
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 February 2008.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2008.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c148GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:39:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_448514
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_448514
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_448514