My Lords, like this whole process, this is extremely disheartening. The order has clearly not been prepared since last Sunday. A framework agreement could, I suggest, have been prepared in the same timescale as the order. I came away from this particular debate in Committee feeling that we had made some progress, not only in gaining some clearer understanding of the Government’s intentions, but also in persuading the Government of the wisdom of involving your Lordships and other colleagues in another place more fully. We now discover that this is not the case. Instead of the assurance I was hoping for, I discover that the Government are still unable to be as open and transparent about their dealings with Northern Rock as they should be. While I will not press the amendment, I am afraid that this does nothing to reassure your Lordships or the public at large as to what the management arrangements will be. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 15 [Orders and regulations: general]:
Banking (Special Provisions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord De Mauley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 21 February 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Banking (Special Provisions) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c361 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:46:55 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447090
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447090
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447090