moved Amendment No. 37:
37: Clause 10, page 6, line 30, after ““account”” insert ““, other than to post the holder regular yearly or half-yearly statements, if requested by the holder””
The noble Lord said: The purpose of the amendment is to provide an extra layer of protection for those individuals who chose to salt away a few hundred pounds in a bank or building society for a distant rainy day—a rainy day which may never come. It would appear that many, if not most, of the amendments to Clause 10 have the same purpose.
As the Bill stands, an account can only remain non-dormant provided that the account holder notifies the bank or building society that he does not wish to be contacted by them for any reason in future. That seems to be a quite unreasonable restriction. Surely any normal or sensible individual would wish to check periodically that the account is still in existence and to know what bank charges, if any, have been levied and interest earned. The amendment is designed to allow for that.
However, it seems to me that government Amendment No. 42 might well achieve exactly the same purpose rather more neatly and comprehensively. If that is indeed the case, I shall happily withdraw the amendment. I beg to move.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Monson
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c336-7GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:26:56 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433039
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433039
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433039