I am slightly confused by all this. I understood that the banks had the ultimate responsibility for finding the rightful owners of these accounts. We now seem to be suggesting that the reclaim fund will have the responsibility. I am sure that the reclaim fund would merely act at a later stage in the proceedings; people would come to it when they thought they had missed out. But it is not the job of the reclaim fund to go out and try to find the rightful owners. Surely that exercise will already have been done by the banks.
On the question of security and people’s identities being protected, I would have thought that the same thing that covered the banks should cover the reclaim fund, rather than it having a special category. I am inclined to agree with the noble Lord, Lord Newby, that this smacks more of the public sector than the private sector. It would seem to be more of a quasi-private organisation.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c63-4GC Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:24 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428537
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428537
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428537