UK Parliament / Open data

Legal Services Bill [Lords]

Proceeding contribution from Bridget Prentice (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bills on Legal Services Bill [Lords].
For completeness, I should say to the hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr. Djanogly) that I am disappointed that he has not been mature enough to join the consensus that everyone else has reached; he obviously wanted to make his partisan party point. There are safeguards in the amendments. I remind the hon. Gentleman again that reserved services can be provided only by qualified lawyers who are subject to regulation by the approved regulators. I do not think that I can make the point much simpler for him; perhaps he should speak to his right hon. and hon. and learned Friends in the other place, who might be able to explain it to him in words of half a syllable. That might help. I understand the point made by the hon. Member for Somerton and Frome (Mr. Heath) about mutuals. However, mutual bodies and other membership-based organisations can have exemptions under proposed new subsection 15(4) if they meet the relevant criteria, which involve not providing services to the public or a section of the public. A lot of membership-based bodies will qualify for that exemption. I commend the amendments. Question put:— The House divided: Ayes 301, Noes 145.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

465 c301 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top