UK Parliament / Open data

Serious Crime Bill [HL]

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 24 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bills on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 33. Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 33.—(Lord Bassam of Brighton.) [Amendment No. 33A not moved.] On Question, Motion agreed to. 34: Page 29, line 29, at end insert- ““(4A) Nothing in this section or Schedule 4 restricts the operation of any enactment by virtue of which an act constituting an offence under this Part is triable under the law of England and Wales or Northern Ireland.”” 35: Insert the following new Clause- ““Institution of proceedings etc. for an offence under this Part (1) Any provision to which this section applies has effect with respect to an offence under this Part as it has effect with respect to the anticipated offence. (2) This section applies to provisions made by or under an enactment (whenever passed or made) that- (a) provide that proceedings may not be instituted or carried on otherwise than by, or on behalf or with the consent of, any person (including any provision which also makes exceptions to the prohibition); (b) confer power to institute proceedings; (c) confer power to seize and detain property; (d) confer a power of forfeiture, including any power to deal with anything liable to be forfeited. (3) In relation to an offence under section 43- (a) the reference in subsection (1) to the anticipated offence is to be read as a reference to any offence specified in the indictment; and (b) each of the offences specified in the indictment must be an offence in respect of which the prosecutor has power to institute proceedings. (4) Any consent to proceedings required as a result of this section is in addition to any consent required by section 50. (5) No proceedings for an offence under this Part are to be instituted against a person providing information society services who is established in an EEA State other than the United Kingdom unless the derogation condition is satisfied. (6) The derogation condition is satisfied where the institution of proceedings- (a) is necessary to pursue the public interest objective; (b) relates to an information society service that prejudices that objective or presents a serious and grave risk of prejudice to it; and (c) is proportionate to that objective. (7) The public interest objective is public policy. (8) In this section ““information society services”” has the same meaning as in section (Providers of information society services), and subsection (7) of that section applies for the purposes of this section as it applies for the purposes of that section.”” 36: Insert the following new Clause- ““No individual liability in respect of corporate manslaughter In section 18 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (c. 19) (no individual liability for offences under that Act) after subsection (1) insert- ““(1A) An individual cannot be guilty of an offence under Part 2 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (encouraging or assisting crime) by reference to an offence of corporate manslaughter.””””

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

695 c1100 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top