I thank the noble Baroness for her reply. I am grateful that she shares my objectives and motives, and I hope that we can continue to discuss this matter. I was not sure that I agreed with her when she said that equity means that we have to have a national system. One problem with a national system is that it tends to be a Whitehall, one-size-fits-all, top-down system. We need systems to be locally tailored to local circumstances and to individual circumstances.
I do not totally accept that this is just about being more ambitious with the power of well-being. In the United States, where individual states picked up President Clinton’s very bold welfare reforms and were able to bring in their own powers, we could see that devolution made a real difference on the ground. As I said, I am grateful for the Minister’s response and I hope that we can continue to discuss this issue. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 239 [Orders, regulations and guidance]:
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bruce-Lockhart
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 July 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c870 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:24:25 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414230
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414230
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414230