Before the Minister concludes his remarks, may I clarify his position, so that I can respond more or less intelligently to it? As I understand it, the Government now apparently accept Lords amendment No. 14, which would remove clause 5(6), but disagree with Lords amendment No. 35, which removes the word ““under”” and adds the words,"““or regulations under—""( ) section 5(1) or ( 3)(c),””"
The Government wish to replace ““5(1) or (3)(c)”” with ““5(3)(c)””. The effect of the Government’s case is that the statutory instrument will be subject to the negative, as opposed to the affirmative, procedure. Will the Minister remind the House which bit of his argument puts forward that case?
Offender Management Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Garnier
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 July 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Offender Management Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
463 c386 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:56:24 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412322
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412322
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412322