UK Parliament / Open data

Offender Management Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Garnier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bills on Offender Management Bill.
Before the Minister concludes his remarks, may I clarify his position, so that I can respond more or less intelligently to it? As I understand it, the Government now apparently accept Lords amendment No. 14, which would remove clause 5(6), but disagree with Lords amendment No. 35, which removes the word ““under”” and adds the words,"““or regulations under—""( ) section 5(1) or ( 3)(c),””" The Government wish to replace ““5(1) or (3)(c)”” with ““5(3)(c)””. The effect of the Government’s case is that the statutory instrument will be subject to the negative, as opposed to the affirmative, procedure. Will the Minister remind the House which bit of his argument puts forward that case?

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

463 c386 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top