I am grateful to the Minister for that comprehensive explanation of the two orders, and the remarks with which he finished about the increasing sophistication of terrorists and of the criminal fraternity in general. I am pleased to hear that there was extensive consultation on both orders, and we welcome the safeguards provided under both the codes: first, the Interception of Communications Commissioner and, then, a further appeal to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
In the second order the controls on public authorities to ensure that the use of the powers is undertaken appropriately and in compliance with the requirements and principles of Part 3 and the code of practice are, again, reassuring. I am grateful to the Minister for recognising the question of the burden of proof, on which we are reassured. We have no objections to either order.
Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Investigation of Protected Electronic Information: Code of Practice) Order 2007
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Bridgeman
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 July 2007.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Investigation of Protected Electronic Information: Code of Practice) Order 2007.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c6GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:49:45 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_411355
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_411355
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_411355