I apologise to the Minister but I am having some difficulty in understanding how this will help to achieve his aims, which are very laudable. We all recognise this as a problem, but surely it is far more likely that these children are already being monitored: they should be monitored in the children’s home and they should be monitored by the social worker. But if they are obliged to go to somewhere where they think they might be picked up and taken off to a detention removal centre, is this not, on balance, more likely to make the situation worse than better? In any case, sometimes they will leave of their own volition from the setting they are in—not because someone is taking them away but because they are unhappy with the home or unhappy with their residential childcare worker, and so on. I would appreciate more reassurance from the Minister that this would not be an inadvertent consequence. I apologise for interrupting the Minister but this is a very important point. He has said already that too many children disappear from care at the moment.
UK Borders Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Listowel
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 12 July 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on UK Borders Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
693 c253GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:45:45 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410451
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410451
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410451