The noble Viscount gets me to put on the record the fact that the procedures will not be directly approved by Parliament, but we have had extensive consultation. They are in the Library; I have asked officials to provide copies to Members of the Committee. We will receive with interest comment on both the draft designation principles and the standard operating procedures. If we were to go along the route of parliamentary approval, which I do not think the noble Viscount is suggesting that we do, we would be locked into something that is less manageable as a practical working document. I accept that the PACE codes are revisable, but they take longer to be revised and are, in a sense, less flexible. A balance between the two has to be struck, and we think that we have got it about right. I invite Committee colleagues to look at what we have provided and reflect perhaps, as we have to do, between this stage and Report.
UK Borders Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bassam of Brighton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 July 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on UK Borders Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
693 c60GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:31 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_407265
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_407265
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_407265