UK Parliament / Open data

Statistics and Registration Service Bill

I suspect that, with this grouping of amendments, we have come to the nub of the remaining points at issue. The amendments all relate to the important issue of who under the new system should determine the rules relating to how and when statistics are released and early access to official statistics in their final form prior to publication—the so-called pre-release access points. There was much discussion of those matters when the Bill was last before the House. I also know from reading the proceedings that a full and robust debate also took place in the other place. It is worth noting that, in both Houses and across all parties, there has been an acceptance of the principal case for pre-release access to continue under the new system. Both Houses have recognised that the principal case for pre-release is widely accepted internationally, although I accept that international practice actually varies considerably. All have accepted that Ministers need to account for the implications of policy areas for which they are democratically responsible at the time of release. That is simply the way and it has become expected that Ministers deal with such issues. We have achieved consensus on the view that Ministers need to be fully informed in order to make accurate judgments as to the need and form of any mitigating action that might be required in the light of statistical release—for example, to prevent or manage market disturbances and disruption. That however is as far as our common understanding on the issues appears to go. The Opposition accept that pre-release access must continue, but believe that the board should determine the rules and the circumstances in which it is provided. I do not agree with their reasoning on that. We all accept that Ministers require pre-release access and we all understand why they require it. Surely Ministers themselves are the best placed to judge how much pre-release access they require, and under what conditions they require it in order to be fully informed and in a position to act if required in response to a statistical release.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

462 c709-10 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top