First, yes, I speak on behalf of the Liberal Democrats. Secondly, my speech is not a eulogy to the legal professions. I have made it clear that the legal profession has a good reputation in this country, but it has also had its significant failures, and I started by saying that that is why we are in the Chamber debating the Bill. We are trying to get a structure.
We have supported there being clear, regulatory objectives. That is a good thing. We have supported there being a legal services board—an overarching regulatory authority. That is a good thing. We have supported the separation of representation and regulation. That is a good thing. We have also supported there being one door to a legal complaints service. None of that is a eulogy to or defence of the current position or the past practices of the major professions—the Bar and solicitors—or any other relevant profession. This is not about taking a defensive position, it is about making sure that we respect what works and put it in the context of an accountable and better-to-use service that gives citizens the rights that they expect.
Legal Services Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Simon Hughes
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 June 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Legal Services Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
461 c56-7 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:24:04 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400179
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400179
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400179