moved Amendment No. 236A:
236A: Clause 52, page 26, line 6, leave out paragraph (b)
The noble Viscount said: The Statistics Commission is to disappear, as have other of this Government’s short-lived creations; yet the commission has established itself well and developed its practice in an exemplary way. The given reason for its departure is the wish to avoid, "““competing independent centres of statistical expertise””."
The commission will have been well pleased with ““independent”” and ““expertise”” but mystified by ““competing””. How could a commission spending £1.5 million a year advising and monitoring ever be in competition with the Office for National Statistics, with its £200 million a year? We need a more convincing explanation. Could the commission have become too independent and too expert and thus out of day-to-day control? I beg to move.
Statistics and Registration Service Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Eccles
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 May 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Statistics and Registration Service Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c752-3 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:19:02 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399165
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399165
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399165