I apologise. The cinema would be an asset to her city, but the fact remains that there appears to be no developer willing to take the project on, despite the public support that it enjoys. Nothing that the Government might do about planning legislation will change that. I do not believe that the proposal before us would hinder that process: on the contrary, I believe that it will help because, if it impacts business activity by changing planning decisions, that will be beneficial. That is part of its purpose, and it is an exact corollary of what the hon. Member for Surrey Heath said.
I therefore hope that the House will support the motion. I appreciate that serious points have been made in what has been a good-natured debate. I look forward to discussing them further on Second Reading and as the Bill proceeds through a Committee of the whole House.
Resolved,"That provision may be made for and in connection with the liability of owners of unoccupied hereditaments to a non-domestic rate."
Ordered,
That a Bill be brought in upon the foregoing Resolution: And that the Prime Minister, Mr. Secretary Prescott, Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Secretary Darling, Mr. Secretary Hain, Secretary Ruth Kelly, Mr. Stephen Timms, John Healey, Mr. Phil Woolas, Ed Balls and Angela E. Smith do prepare and bring it in.
Ways and Means
Proceeding contribution from
Phil Woolas
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 10 May 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Rating (Empty Properties) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
460 c365 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:29:55 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_396321
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_396321
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_396321